Legal Opinion

Kaechele v. Kaechele

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1988No. 87-42PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.

This appeal presents two related issues: (1) whether the trial court abused its discretion in making a sustenance alimony award which does not place the parties in complete parity, and (2) whether the failure of the trial court to specifically mention the BrownMcNeely bonus in its alimony award constitutes an abuse of discretion.

“ ‘The term “abuse of discretion” connotes more than an error of law or judgment; it implies that the court’s attitude is unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable. * * * [Citations omitted.]’ ” Blakemore v. Blakemore (1983), 5 Ohio St. 3d 217, 219, 5 OBR 481, 482,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Cherry v. CherryOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Martin v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Berk v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Tracy v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Holcomb v. HolcombOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Kunkle v. KunkleOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Richard E. Hoover v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API