Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Pegues v. Polson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 14, 1924No. 11515Published

1Concurrence

Mr. Justice Cothran:

I concur in the result of the opinion of Mr. Justice Fraser, but upon a different ground, which I shall present:

Action in claim and delivery of personal property upon notes secured by chattel mortgages, executed by the defendant to H-. J. Sellers Company. The action was brought by B. F. Pegues as trustee in bankruptcy of the payee. Upon the trial of the case the plaintiff offered parol testimony to prove the appointment of the plaintiff as trustee, to which the defendant objected upon the ground that the appointment was a matter of record and could not be established by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Enoree v. YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Woodcock v. Bostic.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. Downing North Denver Land Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API