Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hunter v. Patterson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1996No. 95-1759PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant asserts in his sole proposition of law that where parties have previously agreed to and the trial court has ordered nonbinding mediation of all postdivorce disputes prior to initiating court action, a writ of prohibition or mandamus will issue to preclude court action on a child support modification motion until mediation has first been attempted.

We review the summary dismissal of a complaint upon a finding of an adequate remedy at law by determining if the court of appeals abused its discretion. State ex rel. Hipp v. N. Canton (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 102, 103, 637 N.E.2d 317, 318.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Keenan v. CalabreseOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Newton v. Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. City of Whitehall ex rel. Wolfe v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Willacy v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Longacre v. Penton Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Squire v. PhippsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. State ex rel. Gideon v. PageOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. State ex rel. Hunter v. PattersonOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API