Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Watts

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 12, 1995No. 94-03149PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PATTERSON, Acting Chief Judge.

Ronald Fowler appeals from an interlocutory order which abates this action and refers the matter to arbitration. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(v). Because there is no arbitration agreement in effect between the parties, we reverse and remand for further proceedings in the trial court.

This dispute arises out of the shareholder agreements between appellee David Watts and appellant Ronald Fowler. Watts and Fowler formed two corporations, Thrill Technology, Inc. (Thrill) and appellee Interactive Attractions, Inc.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. ALL AM. SEMICONDUCTOR v. Unisys Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Katzin v. MansdorfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Prosource Services Corp. v. Thomas Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API