Legal Opinion

Katzin v. Mansdorf

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 28, 1993No. 93-966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

624 So.2d 810 (1993)

Alfred J. KATZIN, Trustee; Maurice E. Levenson; Michael J. Friedlander; Alice Levee; and Grace Dunlap, Trustee, Appellants,

v.

Abraham B. MANSDORF, Appellee.

No. 93-966.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 28, 1993.

Grafton N. Carlson, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellants.

Rosenberg & Rothman, and Sheldon Rosenberg, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and COPE, JJ.

2Per curiam

Because the promissory notes sued upon below (a) contain no express terms requiring the parties to arbitrate any dispute arising from the notes, and (b) the agreement to arbitrate…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. G & N CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. KirpatovskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Painewebber, Inc. v. HessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. McClure v. Painewebber, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Urquiaga v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amour & More North American Licensing, Inc. v. ZammattaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Fowler v. WattsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. AMOUR & MORE N. AMERICAN v. ZammattaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Regency Homes of Dade, Inc. v. McMillenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API