Legal Opinion

Bromberg v. Drake

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1954No. 35372PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

It is the contention of the defendant that the plaintiff did not procure a purchaser who was ready, able, and willing to buy the property of the owner at a price satisfactory to the owner. The record shows that the price of $53,000, including a cash payment of $15,000, was the price for which the house was sold and therefore was the price satisfactory to the owner. The legal tradition is recognized that Code § 4-213 applies. That section reads: “Broker's right to Commission.— The fact that property is placed in the hands of a broker to sell shall not prevent the owner from selling, unless…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Foster & Ackerman v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Vaughn v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  3. Crutchfield v. Western Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  4. Fox v. Von KampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. May v. SibleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Williams & Templeton v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Williams & Templeton v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  4. Wood v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API