Wood v. Mobley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentBell, Presiding Judge
Under the present Georgia procedural law, there is little difference between a motion for directed verdict and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. In the grant of the former, the judge tells the jury what to do and they then have no choice and nothing but a robot voice. In the grant of the latter the result is the same, identically so, although the jury had previously returned a verdict on its own. The latter erases the verdict. Each motion is based on a consideration by the trial judge of all of the evidence in the case. With the right to appeal error in the refusal to grant a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Keener v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.