Legal Opinion

Wood v. Mobley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1966No. 41790Published

1DissentBell, Presiding Judge

Under the present Georgia procedural law, there is little difference between a motion for directed verdict and a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. In the grant of the former, the judge tells the jury what to do and they then have no choice and nothing but a robot voice. In the grant of the latter the result is the same, identically so, although the jury had previously returned a verdict on its own. The latter erases the verdict. Each motion is based on a consideration by the trial judge of all of the evidence in the case. With the right to appeal error in the refusal to grant a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Keener v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  4. City of Valdosta v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API