Legal Opinion

Michael P. Kelly and John T. Kelly v. The Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and Dionne Staples

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 28, 1993No. 92-4064PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is a petition to review the final decision of an administrative law judge (ALJ) under the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (the Act), 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq. (1988). We have jurisdiction under § 3612®. The ALJ found that the petitioners, Michael P. Kelly and John T. Kelly, violated the Act by refusing to rent an apartment owned by the Kellys because the applicant had two children. Such a refusal on the basis of “familial status” is unlawful discrimination under the prohibitions contained in § 3604. The ALJ awarded damages to the complainant, and enjoined…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas C. Baumgardner v. The Secretary, United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, on Behalf of Blanton B. HolleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State, Civil Rights Commission v. County Line Park, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Savin Rock Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Lindsey v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1999
  4. United States v. Tropic Seas, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1995
  5. United States v. Gorman Towers ApartmentsDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API