Legal Opinion

United States v. Wendy Moore

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 20, 2016No. 14-4645, 14-4646PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge HARRIS wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judge MOTZ joined.

PAMELA HARRIS, Circuit Judge:

A jury convicted Wendy Annette Moore and Christopher Austin Latham of participating in a murder-for-hire plot targeting Latham’s estranged wife. In this consolidated appeal, Moore and Latham challenge their convictions, arguing that the district court constructively amended the indictment through erroneous jury instructions and improperly admitted hearsay and character evidence. We disagree, and affirm the convictions.

I

A

Viewed in the light most…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. LightyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Omar BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  2. United States v. Germaine CannadyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Lamine CamaraCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Joseph DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Rose-Marie NsahlaiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API