Legal Opinion

Cruts v. Wray

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR to the district court for Hitchcock county.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

This was an action of replevin. Plaintiff being defeated in the district court brings the cause into this court for review by proceedings in error. There was no motion for a new trial, and hence we cannot examine as to any of the alleged errors which occurred prior to the rendition of the judgment. This is fully settled by the adjudications of this court and must be adhered to. Cropsey v. Wiggenhorn, 3 Neb., 108. Singleton v. Boyle, 4 Id., 414. Horacek v. Keebler, 5 Id., 356. Hosford v. Stone, 6 Id., 380.

The verdict of the jury was as follows (omitting title of the case):

“We, the jury in this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cropsey v. WiggenhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Welton v. BeltezoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hickman-Williams Agency v. HaneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Scroggin v. National Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Norton v. Nebraska Loan & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Erck v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Creighton v. HaythornNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API