New England Acceptance Corp. v. United States
District Court, D. New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DICLERICO, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs initially brought this action against several defendants seeking to quiet title to a tract of land in Alton, New Hampshire. Before the court is the motion of plaintiff New England Acceptance Corporation (“NEAC”) for summary judgment against the defendant, the United States of America (the “government”), on issues of lien priority (document no. 148). 1
Background 2
On August 14, 1986, Elizabeth Boyer conveyed by gift a tract of land in Alton, New Hampshire (the “property”), to Campfire Point Associates (“CPA”), a partnership comprised of her children,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. BotefuhrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Estate of DavenportDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2001
- United States v. Charles E. Botefuhr, and the Estate of Birnie Davenport Patricia L. Vestal, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Birnie Davenport Gordon E. Davenport, United States of America v. Patricia L. Vestal, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Birnie Davenport, and Charles E. Botefuhr the Estate of Birnie Davenport Gordon E. Davenport, United States of America v. Gordon E. Davenport, and the Estate of Birnie M. Davenport Patricia L. Vestal, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Birnie Davenport Charles E. BotebuhrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002