British-American Oil Producing Co. v. Buffington
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentHutcheson, Circuit Judge
What the parties to it intended as a protective arrangement between joint venturers, owners of oil properties, to insure that the drilling development would be competently done and at a reasonable price, has, I think, been turned by the judgment below and its affirmance here into a contrivance by which appellees have ' obtained their share of production without paying their share of the drilling costs. If I could agree with the majority that the provisión that appellees are to have the “preference of all future drilling operations at the prevailing contract price”, was sufficiently definite…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spivey v. Saner-Ragley Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Jordan v. Buick Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Wynne v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Emery Bros. v. Mutual Benefit Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Forster-Davis Motor Co. v. SlaterbeckSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.