Legal Opinion

State v. Hibler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 13, 1988No. M712154; CA A47109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

Defendant was charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. The state appeals an order suppressing evidence seized after a stop of defendant.1 ORS 138.060(3). We reverse.

These facts are not disputed: Shortly after midnight, while on patrol, Portland police officers Savage and Bechard drove up behind defendant’s car, which was stopped at a traffic light. The light was green for defendant. As the police car drove up behind it, defendant’s car did not move, but remained stationary for 15 to 30 seconds while defendant talked with or yelled at a pedestrian on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. RatliffOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Murray Well-Drilling v. DeischCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. CanavanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API