Legal Opinion
Deoudes v. GB MacKe Corporation
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 7, 1959No. 2356PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellee, The G. B. Macke Corporation, hereafter referred to as Macke, sued appellants Deoudes and Cokimos, a partnership, trading as D. C. Novelty Company, hereafter referred to as D. C. Novelty, alleging that D. C. Novelty had ttnlawfully interfered with the contract relationship between Macke and one Gogos. Trial resulted in a judgment for damages in favor of Macke and D. C. Novelty has appealed.
The record contains no statement of proceedings and evidence or transcript of the testimony and the only record which we can consider is the trial court’s findings of fact and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Haelan Laboratories, Inc. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Meyer v. Washington Times Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Donovan Construction Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sturdza v. United Arab EmiratesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Sorrells v. Garfinckel's, Brooks Bros., Miller & Rhoads, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Alfred A. Altimont, Inc. v. Chatelain, Samperton & NolanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Brown v. CarrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- NCRIC, Inc. v. Columbia Hospital for Women Medical Center, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.