Legal Opinion

Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. Kane

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 16, 2019No. COA18-239Published

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

*2 Where plaintiff had a right to enter defendants' properties pursuant to a valid easement, we affirm the trial court's ruling of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff.

In 1911, the predecessor to plaintiff Duke Energy Progress, Inc., recorded with the Wake County Register of Deeds, an easement over a 50-foot strip of land for the purpose of maintaining high-voltage power lines. The easement granted the right to maintain, operate, and "keep in right" the easement (hereinafter "Easement Agreement"). In addition, the Easement Agreement grants plaintiff "the right to clear and keep…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Gaston County Dyeing MacHine Co. v. Northfield InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Hart v. BrienzaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API