Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Parker

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided May 7, 2008No. 1:06-cv-00665PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER

DAVID N. HURD, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff James Wheeler (“plaintiff’) brings this action against defendants Sandy Parker (“Parker”), Bruce Potter (“Potter”), and Berkshire Union Free School District (“District”) (collectively “defendants”) for denial of due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. § 1988. 1

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendants oppose. Defendants cross-move for summary judgment under Rule 56. Plaintiff opposes. Oral argument was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rusk v. New York State Thruway AuthorityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API