Legal Opinion
Kirschke v. Lamar
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided June 6, 1969No. 16434-4PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS, OPINION, AND JUDGMENT
ELMO B. HUNTER, District Judge.
This is an action under Tit. 35 U.S.C. Section 146 by a person dissatisfied with the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences on the question of priority to an invention. The invention in dispute is a self-cleaning combination dishwasher-oven. Defendant Lamar filed his application for a patent, serial no. 279,557, on May 10, 1963. Plaintiff Kirschke, General Electric’s assignor, filed his application for a patent, serial no. 339,711, on January 23, 1964.
Proceedings in Patent Office
The competing patent applications were placed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Barrett Co. v. Koppers Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1927
- Radio Corporation of America and United States of America v. International Standard Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Farrand Optical Co., Inc. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Marshall B. Alpert v. Harvey L. SlatinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norman W. Kirschke and General Electric Company v. William C. LamarCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Anderson v. AndersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Shaffer Tool Works v. Joy Manufacturing Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1974