Legal Opinion

R. R. Stolley Corp. of Austin v. Quebedeaux

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 14, 1934No. Nos. 7911, 7925Published

1Opinion

When the decision was handed down in the above causes, the writer noted his dissent, which was predicated upon the following propositions:

1. The cross-action of appellee, in so far as it sought an affirmative decree validating the judgment, could not be maintained as an independent suit; and therefore plaintiff's nonsuit eliminated this issue, thus leaving the cross-action upon the injunction bond the only matter in controversy.

2. The liability of the sureties upon the injunction bond was only for the penalty prescribed by statute and such special damages as might be pleaded and proved…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hoodless v. WinterTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Winters Mut. Aid Ass'n Circle No. 2 v. ReddinTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Stevens v. StoneTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Davis v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Halbrook v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API