Legal Opinion

Hoodless v. Winter

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1891No. 7031PublishedCited by 88 opinions

The opinion states .the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HENRY, Associate Justice.

This suit was brought by appellants in the form of an action of trespass to try title against all of the defendants except Wise. The charge against him was that he was “operating some kind of a claim” to the land, which was “a cloud upon the title of plaintiff G. A. Hoodless.” The prayer of the petition was for a decree against Wise quieting plaintiffs’ title against him, and against the remaining defendants for possession, etc. It does not appear that an answer was filed for Wise, nor that any question was made as to his joinder with the other defendants, or as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De La Vega v. LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. H. Block & Co. v. WeillerTexas Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Greenberg v. BrookshireTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Mokkala v. Mead, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  4. H. H. Watson Co. v. Cobb Grain Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. Village Mills Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API