Allstate Insurance Co. v. Edminster
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice LANG-MIERS.
Cathy Edminster sued her automobile insurer, Allstate Insurance Company, to recover what she contended was its pro rata share of the attorney’s fees incurred for the collection of Allstate’s subrogation interest in a claim against a third party. Both parties filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted Edmin-ster’s motion and denied Allstate’s motion. Because we conclude a material fact issue exists, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Background
On January 2, 2003, Edminster and her two children were injured when another driver…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- FM Properties Operating Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Western Investments, Inc. v. UrenaTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Knebel v. Capital National Bank in AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Brand v. DensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Texas Farmers Insurance v. SealsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Riner v. NeumannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011