Legal Opinion

Elza v. Elza

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 6, 1984No. 3, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES C. MORTON, Jr., Retired, Specially Assigned Judge.

The question we confront in this case is whether the chancellor in a child custody proceeding erred in basing his award of custody to the mother solely on the maternal preference presumption. We conclude that reliance on this presumption contradicts the clear, unambiguous language of Maryland Code (1957, 1983 Repl.Vol.) Art. 72A, § 1, which states in pertinent part: “[I]n any custody proceeding, neither parent shall be given preference solely because of his or her sex.” 1 Therefore, we shall vacate the judgment below and remand the case…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Police Commissioner v. DowlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Ross v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Hild v. HildCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Rand v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rohrbaugh v. Estate of SternCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Comptroller of Treasury v. Gannett Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Robinson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Skeens v. PaternoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Giffin v. CraneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API