Legal Opinion

Smith v. Denross Contracting, U.S., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 2012No. COA12-169PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, Judge.

Where the New York State Insurance Fund accepted premium payments calculated by the Fund to provide workers’ compensation liability insurance to employees of DenRoss Contracting, U.S., Inc., working in North Carolina with knowledge that DenRoss maintained only clerical staff in New York State, the Fund is estopped to deny coverage for plaintiff’s compensable injuries on the basis of quasiestoppel. Where the record indicates that the New York State Insurance Fund filed a denial of plaintiff’s claim within thirty-days of notice of claim from the Commission, we reverse the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Evans v. Housing Auth. of City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Godley v. County of PittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Brooks v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Biddix v. Rex Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Falin v. Roberts Co. Field Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Landover Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. SandersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Rogelio Garcia Valdez, et al. v. Signature Landscape, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API