Legal Opinion

State v. Lane

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 2018No. 606A05-3PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Justice.

**509 In this appeal we consider the materiality of postconviction DNA testing of hair samples in a capital case. In denying defendant's motion for postconviction DNA testing, the trial court found that defendant failed to show the requested testing was material to his defense-specifically, that there was no reasonable probability that the verdict would have been more favorable to defendant if the testing had been conducted. We agree and hold defendant has failed to prove the materiality of his request.

On 7 April 2003, defendant was indicted in Wayne County for first-degree…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Indiana v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ByersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  3. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2022
  4. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  5. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API