Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment

Cygnar v. City of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 4, 1989No. 87-1181Published

1Concurring in the judgmentRipple, Circuit Judge

As the district court and my brothers conclude, the record certainly contains sufficient evidence to support a finding of racial discrimination. I would permit that jury verdict to stand. In my view, defendants’ “house-cleaning,” followed by an erratic hiring of new employees, cannot, as a *849matter of law, constitute an affirmative action plan. These transfer decisions were informal race-motivated attempts to remedy, on an ad hoc basis, a perceived imbalance similar to the informal affirmative action rejected by this court in Lehman v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 651 F.2d 520, 525-28 (7th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Margaret Davlan v. Otis Elevator CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  3. Jerry W. LEHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. YELLOW FREIGHT SYSTEM, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Lilly v. City of BeckleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API