In re Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*1042ORDER GRANTING VOLKSWAGEN’S MOTION TO DISMISS WYOMING’S COMPLAINT
CHARLES R. BREYER, United States District Judge
From approximately May 2006 to November 2015, Volkswagen AG conspired to and did defraud the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by surreptitiously installing software 'in its -“clean diesel” vehicles that masked true nitrogen oxide (NOx) emission levels. In response, the U.S. Department of Justice (on behalf of EPA) filed civil .and criminal, actions against Volkswagen to enforce the Clean Air Act (CAA), and Volkswagen ultimately pled guilty to three criminal felony counts…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Duramax Diesel Litig. Andrei Fenner v. Gen. Motors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2018
- Epc of Hillsborough Cty. v. Volkswagen Grp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- In re Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Mktg., Sales Practices, & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- State ex rel. Yost v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaf (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.