Legal Opinion

Ingber v. Weinbrot

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided November 20, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ÍIebzka, J.

The gravamen of the complaint is that the defendants fraudulently induced the plaintiff to pay them $400 as a “ bonus ” for renting an apartment dwelling to the plaintiff. It is alleged that1 ‘ the defendants falsely and fraudulently stated and represented to the plaintiff that they were legally entitled to receive a bonus under the laws of the State of New York.”

In preparation for trial plaintiff seeks to examine the defendants before trial in support of the allegations of the complaint. The defendants resist upon the ground that the complaint does not contain facts sufficient to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Berry v. American Central Insurance Co. of St. LouisNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Van Slochem v. . VillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Shea v. SheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  4. Moffat v. Phœnix Brewery Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  5. Cash v. American Specialty Tailoring Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sylvester v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API