Legal Opinion

(PC)Maestas v. Phillips

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 26, 2023No. 1:23-cv-00893Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RANDY MAESTAS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00893-EPG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED, WITH 12 v. PREJUDICE, BASED ON CLAIM PRECLUSION AND FRIVOLOUSNESS 13 BRYAN D. PHILLIPS, RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE 14 Defendant. DAYS 15 (ECF No. 1) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Randy Maestas is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 19 rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 5). Plaintiff filed his complaint on June 20 14, 2023, alleging that Warden Bryan D. Phillips…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API