Legal Opinion

Dynacs Engineering Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 21, 2000No. 00-166 CPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*241 ORDER 1

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court is Defendant’s Request for Reconsideration of the Court’s Liability Finding or, Alternatively, Defendant’s Suggestion for Further Proceedings (Def.’s Req.). Defendant requests reconsideration of this court’s Opinion and Order of September 29, 2000 on the ground that plaintiff has failed to establish the requisite prejudice to prevail in this protest. Def.’s Req. at 1, 3. Defendant seeks reconsideration pursuant to Rule 59(a)(2) of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC), which provides:(2) The court, at any time while a suit is pending before it, or after…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shell Petroleum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. CNA Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. Dynacs Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  3. Griffin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Webster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  5. Curtis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API