Legal Opinion
Dynacs Engineering Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 21, 2001No. 00-166 CPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HEWITT, Judge.
This is a remedy determination in a post-award bid protest action. Plaintiff, Dynacs Engineering Company (Dynacs), filed suit challenging the contract award decision of defendant, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA or agency or government), to Federal Data Corporation (FDC or intervenor) for Microgravity Research, Development and Operations services.2 On *615cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record, the court determined that the agency had unfairly favored the successful offeror in violation of the Federal Acquisition Regulations…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Fmc Corporation and Monsanto Company v. The United States, and Rotem Fertilizers Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Statistica, Inc. v. Warren G. Christopher, Secretary of State, and the Orkand Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Stratos Mobile Networks Usa, LLC v. United States, and Comsat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Cubic Defense Systems, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Afghan American Army Services Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Caddell Construction Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Career Training Concepts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Idea International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- CSE Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.