Yeager v. J. R. Christ Co.

OPINION

KRAFT, District Judge.

Following a second trial of these actions, brought under the Wrongful Death and Survival Acts of Pennsylvania,1 the jury returned verdicts in favor of the remaining defendants,2 J. R. Christ & *188Co., Inc. (Christ) and Mast Engineering Co., Inc. (Mast).

Following the entry of judgment upon the verdicts the plaintiff filed a timely motion for new trial in support of which 42 reasons were assigned. The record reveals, however, that plaintiff’s counsel properly preserved but seven grounds,3 by specific exceptions following our charge. (n. t. 597-601).

Of these seven…