Legal Opinion
Selimoglu v. Phimvongsa
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 2, 2010No. AC 30607PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The plaintiff, Zeliha Selimoglu, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, granting the motion to dismiss her second action filed by the defendants, Maly Phimvongsa and Eastern Psychological Services, LLC (Eastern). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court, in reaching its conclusion, improperly applied the prior pending action doctrine. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the resolution of the plaintiffs appeal. The plaintiff commenced an action by filing with the Superior Court a three count…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boone v. William W. Backus HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Hatch v. SpoffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
- Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Gold v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Town of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cammarota v. GuerreraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Pellet v. Keller Williams Realty Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Kleinman v. ChapnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Gainey v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Luongo Construction & Development, LLC v. MacFarlaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.