Legal Opinion · Dissent

P.H. Chadbourne & Co. v. Inhabitants of Bethel

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 17, 1982Published

1DissentCarter, Justice

Motivated by what I think to be significant institutional concerns of the courts in accomplishing their role of reviewing the decisions of governmental entities under M.R.Civ.P. 80B, I dissent from the result reached by the majority. I would remand *403this ease to the Superior Court with instructions for further remand to the County Commissioners for the making of additional findings of fact. Because the factual statement set out in the majority opinion does not illuminate the factual predicates for those institutional considerations which are of concern to me, I shall briefly state facts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dunlop v. BachowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. City of Yonkers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Gashgai v. Board of Registration in MedicineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API