Legal Opinion
Challen v. Town and Country Charge
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 18, 1982No. 81 C 5724PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
James and Cecelia Challen (“Challens”) sue Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago (“Continental”) and its Town and Country Charge division (“Town and Country”) 1 based on an allegedly tortious letter sent by defendant to Cecelia Challen’s employer concerning an outstanding debt. Continental has moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 12 for an order dismissing Counts I, II, III and V of the Complaint. 2 For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order Continental’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Coun…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Herman v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Patton v. JacobsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
- Midwest Glass Co. v. Stanford Development Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Standard Oil Co. v. Landmark Farm Bureau CooperativeOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henry H. HALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, as Secretary of the Army, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Bond v. PecautDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. First Wisconsin Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985