Legal Opinion
Lee E. Morris, Inc., and Pacific National Fire Insurance Company v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit and on Behalf of James E. Roberts, United States of America, for the Use and Benefit and on Behalf of James E. Roberts, Cross-Appellant v. Lee E. Morris, Inc., and Pacific National Fire Insurance Company, Cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1955No. 4989PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
219 F.2d 541
LEE E. MORRIS, Inc., and Pacific National Fire Insurance Company, Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit and on behalf of James E. ROBERTS, Appellee.
UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit and on behalf of James E. ROBERTS, Cross-Appellant,
v.
LEE E. MORRIS, Inc., and Pacific National Fire Insurance Company, Cross-Appellees.
No. 4988.
No. 4989.
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.
February 3, 1955.
Edward T. Lazear, Cheyenne, Wyo. (Loomis, Lazear & Wilson, Cheyenne, Wyo., were with him on the briefs), for appellants and cross-appellees.
J.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Ryan v. OhmesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- White Star Bus Line, Inc. v. Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Union Paving Co. v. United States ex rel. Soule Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- L. D. Lloyd v. Jack Grynberg, an Individual D/B/A Jack Grynberg and Associates, and International Timber Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972