Legal Opinion
C.D. Anderson & Co., Inc. v. Michael A. Lemos, and John Lemos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 16, 1987No. 87-1526PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAMUEL P. KING, District Judge:
Appellant C.D. Anderson & Co., Inc. appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Michael A. Lemos. The district court found that C.D. Anderson’s claims under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. § 1962, were barred by an award rendered in an arbitration between C.D. Anderson and Lemos. We affirm the district court’s ruling.
I
BACKGROUND
C.D. Anderson & Co., Inc. is a stock brokerage company. On December 15, 1983, Michael A.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through XcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Jack W. McClain v. Gilbert Apodaca, Kent Rogers, Coronado Financial Corporation and Audio Security, Inc., Edward M. Link and Carl F. AgrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Edward L. Greenblatt v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Letizia v. Prudential Bache Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Clark v. Bear Stearns & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Frank v. United Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Woodrum v. Woodward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Fund for Animals, Inc. v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Woodrum v. Woodward CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.