Legal Opinion

Daneker v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, President Judge.

Karen Daneker (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed a decision of a Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying Claimant’s claim petition for workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant began working for White Haven Center (Employer) in 1978 as a clothing room aide. 1 In 1983, the position of clothing room aide was abolished and Claimant was reassigned as a residential service aide. The change in position resulted in Claimant losing her job seniority and required her to work from 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Morey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Davis v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Volterano v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Whiteside v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Payes v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Farmery v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Rag (Cyprus) Emerald Resources, LP v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. McCarron v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Rag (Cyprus) Emerald Resources, LP v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API