Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Glidden

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 8, 1927No. 26,962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one to contest a will which made nominal bequests to the testator’s children, and devised and bequeathed his property, real and personal, to his grandchildren. The plaintiffs were children of the testator. They were defeated, and appeal.

The petition alleged the will was void on its face for indefiniteness and uncertainty, for impossibility of execution because of its vagueness, and as violative of the rule against perpetuities. The petition also alleged the testator lacked testamentary capacity. The answer *292was a general denial.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. LundySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  2. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quinton v. KendallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. State ex rel. Conly v. Riverside Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Wohlfort v. WohlfortSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API