Smith v. Shiflett
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*463Hill, J.
This is another case of trespassing loggers cutting timber and seeking to avoid the statutory treble damages1 by urging that they did not know they were trespassing. It also involves the issue of the measure of damages to be paid by the mill which bought the timber from the loggers and thereby became responsible in conversion.
The purposes for which our treble damage statute was enacted are stated in Guay v. Washington Nat. Gas Co., 62 Wn.2d 473, 476, 383 P.2d 296 (1963), one of them being:
To discourage persons from carelessly or intentionally removing another’s merchantable shrubs or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
- Watkins v. Siler Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
- Mullally v. ParksWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Blake v. GrantWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Guay v. Washington Natural Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Rayonier, Incorporated v. F. Arnold PolsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Seattle-First National Bank v. BrommersWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Masonite Corp. v. WilliamsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
- Ventoza v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.