Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Bridge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1952No. 31590PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Is a residuary legatee a necessary party to a proceeding by the executor for the construction of a will, the result of which might diminish the quantum of the estate passing to the residuary legatee?

Appellant, as the executor of decedent’s estate, filed a petition praying for a construction of decedent’s will, to the end that the legatees entitled to take under the second paragraph thereof be adjudged.

Paragraph two of the will reads as follows:

“I hereby will and bequeath unto the following named persons the amounts set opposite their respective names, provided, however, that if any of said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chapin v. CollardWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re Krueger's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Toulouse v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. State Ex Rel. Continental Casualty Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1949

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Williams v. Poulsbo Rural Telephone Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Jennings v. SrpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Mayo v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  5. In the Matter of Estate of Van DykeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API