State v. Barnhardt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant argues that the evidence in this case should have been suppressed because the warrant issued lacked probable cause. We disagree.
The affidavit offered in support of probable cause presents this issue: Is an affidavit based on information from an unfamiliar confidential informant who specifically identifies the place to be searched, the evidence to be seized, and a statement that cocaine was seen within the past twenty-four hours sufficient to support a showing of probable cause when the affiant detective verifies the detailed description of the house, and that the truck…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- United States v. Patrick H. DavisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. WitherspoonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. BrodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
- State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- State v. MillowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.