Legal Opinion

State v. Milloway

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1989No. 885SC1304PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress, arguing first that the search warrant application lacked any indicia of probable cause. In evaluating this contention we quote the standard adopted by our Supreme Court in State v. Arrington, 311 N.C. 633, 319 S.E. 2d 254 (1984):

The task of the issuing magistrate is simply to make a practical, common sense decision whether, given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, including the “veracity” and “basis of knowledge” of persons supplying hearsay information, there is a fair…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. ArringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. BarnhardtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. KramerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API