Legal Opinion
United States v. Richard James Tucker
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 16, 2003No. 02-41104PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FURGESON, District Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Richard James Tucker appeals from a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of securities fraud and one count of mail fraud on the ground that the district court improperly excluded his securities expert. Tucker also appeals the district court’s 1) failure to submit an element of the crimes charged to the jury, 2) misstatement of the intent element in the jury charge, 3) failure to provide a specific unanimity-of-theory instruction to the jury, and 4) imposition of consecutive sentences. For the reasons stated below we AFFIRM Tucker’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Brumfield v. HollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Primrose Operating Co. v. National American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Wellogix, Inc. v. Accenture, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Scott Schirmann CreechCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Wen Chyu LiuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.