Lindsey v. Suncrest Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
Defendants made a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, at tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence and at tbe close of all tbe evidence. C. S., 567. Tbe court below allowed tbe motion as to defendants Mack Hensley and Lat McCurry at tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence, and as to tbe Suncrest Lumber Company at tbe close of all'tbe evidence, and in tbis we tbink there was error.
On a motion to nonsuit, tbe evidence is to be taken in tbe light most favorable to plaintiff, and be is entitled to tbe benefit of every reasonable intendment upon tbe evidence, and every reasonable inference to be drawn…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Standard Oil Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
- Hanes v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
3Cited by8 opinions
- Short v. LaFayette Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Lindsey v. Suncrest Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Dickerson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Mangum v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.