Arnold v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
pj¡¡R CURIAM.
The jury having found appellant guilty, the trial court so adjudicated him and sentenced him to five years’ incarceration on a witness tampering charge and one year for petit theft, the latter being a lesser included offense of the robbery with which appellant was charged.
We reject appellant’s arguments directed to his convictions for witness tampering and petit theft and affirm them.
We agree with appellant’s argument that the trial court incorrectly sentenced him on the conviction for petit theft. Section 775.-082(4)(b), Florida Statutes (1989), provides for a sentence of not…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Merrett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996