Merrett v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The defendant contends that the trial court erred (1) in sentencing her to one year of probation by enhancing her penalty from a second degree misdemeanor to a first degree misdemeanor, (2) in imposing investigative costs where the court failed to determine her ability to pay, and (3) in assessing court costs of $116.00, which exceeds the statutory maximum of $60.00. As the state concedes error on all points, the sentence is reversed and remanded.
First, the trial court is instructed to reduce the sentence to six months probation — the maximum probationary sentence for petit theft. §…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blanco-Diaz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Burdo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Beckford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Arnold v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Roldan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Moreno v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996