Legal Opinion

Merrett v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 13, 1996No. 95-1717PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant contends that the trial court erred (1) in sentencing her to one year of probation by enhancing her penalty from a second degree misdemeanor to a first degree misdemeanor, (2) in imposing investigative costs where the court failed to determine her ability to pay, and (3) in assessing court costs of $116.00, which exceeds the statutory maximum of $60.00. As the state concedes error on all points, the sentence is reversed and remanded.

First, the trial court is instructed to reduce the sentence to six months probation — the maximum probationary sentence for petit theft. §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blanco-Diaz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  2. Burdo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Beckford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Arnold v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roldan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Moreno v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API