Legal Opinion
McKenzie v. District of Columbia Department of Human Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 2002No. 01-AA-840PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TERRY, Associate Judge.
In November of 2000, petitioner Gerald McKenzie and his guardian, Sheridan Bacchus, moved from the District of Columbia to a suburb in Maryland. Thereafter the District of Columbia Department of Human Services (“DHS”) determined that Mr. McKenzie was no longer eligible for Medicaid benefits through the District of Columbia because he was no longer a resident. Mr. McKenzie contested that ruling, but a hearing examiner upheld it, and the Chief Operating Officer of DHS adopted the opinion of the hearing examiner as a final decision. Mr. McKenzie now seeks further review in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Levy v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Kalorama Heights Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory AffairsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hamer v. Department of Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Jeffrey R. Gay IISupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- Takahashi v. District of Columbia Department of Human ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008