Legal Opinion
Kalorama Heights Ltd. Partnership v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 16, 1995No. 92-AA-727PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Mayor’s Agent under the Historic Landmark and Historic District Protection Act of 1978, D.C.Code §§ 5-1001 et seq. (1994 Repl.) (the Act), denying its application for a demolition permit for “Moses House,” the former French Embassy in Northwest Washington. Petitioner challenges (1) the Mayor’s Agent’s finding that petitioner’s proposed project was not one of “special merit,” id. §§ 5-1002(10), -1002(11), -1004(e); (2) his finding that denial of the permit did not cause petitioner to suffer “unreasonable economic hardship,” id.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Short v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Cathedral Park Condominium Committee v. District of Columbia Zoning CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Robinson v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Embassy Real Estate Holdings, LLC v. District of Columbia Mayor's Agent for Historic PreservationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- Harris v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.