Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Department of Transportation v. Bridges

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 11, 1996No. A96A0210Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeasley, Chief Judge

I fully concur in Divisions 2 and 3 but respectfully dissent as to Division 1. Since the decision in Tift County v. Smith, 219 Ga. 68 (131 SE2d 527) (1963), the law in Georgia has been that a landowner has a special property right which entitles him to access to a public road *23abutting his property, but that inconvenience of access to other roads and circuity of travel caused by the closure of one end of an abutting road, which closure is a short distance from the landowner’s property, does not violate any special right of the landowner. In this case, the Court holds that such a closure does…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tift County v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  2. Department of Transportation v. Hillside Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Department of Transportation v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  4. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. FountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  5. Department of Transportation v. TaylorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API