Legal Opinion

Reed Marketing Corp. v. Diversified Marketing, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 16, 1976No. 75 C 2409PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DECKER, District Judge.

Garnishee-defendant H. Stuart Cunningham, Clerk of the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, has moved to quash the instant non-wage garnishment summons. The funds at issue are $7,500. posted with the garnishee-defendant as a bond by Morris Friedman. Friedman has been indicted by a Federal Grand Jury in Case No. 76 CR 841, and is awaiting trial. Prior to this the plaintiff had obtained a $30,000 default judgment against Friedman.

The garnishee-government asserts that the proposed garnishment is barred by the principles of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Bank of Hawaii v. BenchwickDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Van CauwenbergheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Landau v. VallenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Brockelman v. BrockelmanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1979
  4. Corporation Co. of Miami v. MikelisDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1979
  5. American Exchange Life Insurance v. PutnickiDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API