Legal Opinion
Brockelman v. Brockelman
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided July 24, 1979No. Civ. A. 79-1060 to 79-1074, 79-1124 and 79-1125PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of the defendant, United States of America, to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants the motion of the United States for dismissal.
These actions arose in the District Court of Saline County, Kansas. The United States removed the actions to this Court under the provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a). By these actions plaintiffs are attempting to garnish the income tax refunds due to the defendants. The United States contends that the garnishment is barred…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lines v. FrederickSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jahn v. ReganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984
- United States v. HarcharDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- Alabama v. BowsherDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Williamson v. Murray (In re Murray)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Sanchez Dieppa v. Rodriguez PereiraDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.